by Kaitlyn Dupuis, PharmD, PGY-1
Pharmacy Resident, North Mississippi Medical Center, Tupelo, MS
When it comes
to teaching, there are several logistical issues that people often overlook —
like dealing with students who do not turn-in assignments on time. When assignments are submitted late, it often
creates additional work for the teacher and inequities with other students who did
not have the benefit of extra time. It’s
difficult to develop a completely fair and consistent “late work policy.” Some teachers choose to accept late work
within a few days of the assignment’s due date for full credit. While others will accept late work with
points deducted. And still others do not accept late work at all. Some teachers believe that if the work is
assigned, it is important to the student’s education. Therefore, they accept
late work to encourage students to complete all assignments.
The majority
of teachers understand that there are certain circumstances when students
simply can’t finish their assignment by the due date. Sometimes things pop-up in life that nobody
has control over. While some excuses are
valid, there are times when students lie or use excuses that really did not prevent
them from submitting their assignment on time.
It’s very difficult to determine which excuses are valid and which excuses
just don’t “add-up.” While teachers
want to be compassionate and understanding, it is also in their job description
to prepare students for the future in a world where deadlines matter and there
are consequences.
Icons made by Freepik from www.flaticon.com |
In a recent
article posted on the Faculty Focus
website entitled A Headache-Free Late
Work Policy by Dr. Laura Schisler, the author proposes a “make-up day.”1
The “make-up day” allows for students to turn-in they missed assignments throughout the semester on the make-up
day to receive partial or full credit.
This removes the need to determine the validity of each student’s excuse. This provides everyone the same opportunity
to submit missed assignments, no matter the reason. This policy makes it harder to miss multiple
assignments, because students must turned-in all assignments on the
predetermined make-up day at the end of the semester. The student either has to
complete the assignment near the initial due date and hold-on to it until the
end of the semester or complete the assignment at the end of the semester when
there is typically an overwhelming number of tests and assignments.
In her essay
entitled It’s Time to Ditch Our Deadlines,
Dr. Ellen Boucher writes about her experience with a rigid late work policy.2 She states that early in her career students
would lose one-third of their grade for an assignment for every day that passed
without turning in the work. In her
experience, because the consequences were so severe, students were turning in
work just to say that they were turning it in.
Other students would not submit anything and simply disappear because
there was no way to pass the class. Dr.
Boucher began to realize that anxiety and burnout were a problem, so she then adopted
a policy where students could submit their assignments two-days late for full
credit. Even after the two-day grace
period, she would allow the student to meet with her to discuss a plan to
turn-in the assignment. Dr. Boucher saw
that her students were working diligently to turn-in quality assignments rather
than turning-in assignments simply for completion. Dr. Boucher saw the level of anxiety and
burnout decrease and felt this compassionate approach benefited her students. While
it is true that anxiety and burnout are on the rise among students in both
college and high school, allowing students to freely turn assignments in, beyond the deadline, can teach
students bad habits.3,4
While
researching late work policies, I came across a few articles regarding “No zero
policies.” There are several schools that
are transitioning to policies that don’t allow grades lower than 50%. If the student refuses to turn-in his or her
assignment, they still receive a 50%.
The philosophy behind this approach is that a zero is simply impossible
to “bounce back” from. One zero in a
semester can cause a student to fail the entire class. People in favor of the “no zero policy” argue
that punishing the student with a zero is not actually assessing their
knowledge. While some people are very
much in favor of a no zero policy, some people think it’s ridiculous. The article cites a Facebook Post called “Is
Our Grading System Fair” that asked 300 members Edutopian Innovative Teachers of
English to comment. Many people disagreed
with the policy, simply because it requires students to do very minimal work in
order to pass a class.3
I think that
late work policies should vary, depending on the student age and nature of the
course. When teaching elementary school
kids, late work policies should be more lenient. Children in lower grade levels do not have
control of their home life and aren’t always responsible enough to get their
school work done without parental guidance.
I believe that it is appropriate for teachers to allow students to
turn-in late work with minimal consequences when they are in lower grade levels. As students age, they should become more
responsible and should know that school is a priority. While life can still get
in the way of older students, I believe that there should be consequences for
late work the majority of the time. Of
course, there should be exceptions for unforeseeable life events, like an
serious illness or death in the family, but students must learn that there are
consequences in life when things aren’t done by their deadline. College
professors should have a more stringent late work policy. I know that burnout and anxiety are very real,
but deadlines are deadlines and the consequences should be bad enough to create
strong incentives to turn assignments in on time. Indeed, a study done at Illinois Wesleyan University
actually showed that students think that late work penalties are fair.5
There probably is no perfect “late
work policy.” I believe that there are
times that deadlines should be extended — so I disagree with “zero tolerance
policies.” I also believe that students
should meet deadlines. While I agree that
teachers should be compassionate and understanding, I also believe that they
are doing students an injustice by allowing them a two-day grace period on
every assignment or by giving them 50% even if they fail to submit anything. I really like having a “make-up day” at the
end of the semester. This allows for
students to still receive credit for missed assignments but doesn’t
require the teacher to create a policy about "acceptable excuses" for late work. The “make-up day” is usually during a very busy
and stressful point in the semester which should encourage students to turn
in their work by the due date. The major
drawback to a “make-up day” is that it signals to students that it’s “ok” to not
meet deadlines. Important life skills
are learned in school and one is time-management. If you fail to meet deadlines in life, you will find yourself without a job … and maybe
without electricity.
References:
- Schisler L. A Headache-Free Late Work Policy. Faculty Focus. Faculty Focus - Higher Ed Teaching & Learning. August 22, 2019.
- Boucher E. It's Time to Ditch Our Deadlines. ChronicleVitae for higher ed jobs, career tools and advice. September 2, 2016.
- Minero E. Do No-Zero Policies Help or Hurt Students? Edutopia. https://www.edutopia.org/article/do-no-zero-policies-help-or-hurt-students. July 3, 2018.
- Center for Collegiate Mental Health. 2018 Annual Report (Publication No. STA 19-180).
- Lui M and Nillas L. Late Work Policies: Their Impact on Student Achievement. John Wesley Powell Student Research Conference, 2015. Abstract 8.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Thank you for your comment to the Educational Theory and Practice blog. It will be submitted for review and approval. Only those comments that substantially enhance the value of the blog site will be released and posted.