Learners of my generation have seen the transformation from a
classroom full of students focused on the chalkboard/whiteboard to one full of laptop
computers with all eyes on the instructor’s PowerPoint slideshow. As a recent
graduate, I witnessed this transition and found slideshow lectures often “death
by PowerPoint.” PowerPoint-based lectures were the norm in most of my pharmacy
school courses. Students expected every
bit of information they needed to know to be written directly on the slides. But many educators feel that learners lose the
big picture when focusing on these small details. PowerPoint presentations can be impersonal and
discourage active student participation.1 Thus, the effectiveness of
this teaching method has been questioned by a number of educators.1,2
Studies have shown that active learning improves student performance.2 Traditional lecturing (similar to many
PowerPoint presentations of today) results in higher student failure rates,
particularly in science, technology, engineering, and mathematic courses.2
One element of PowerPoint slide decks that has received particular
attention is the use of bullet points. In his discussion on PowerPoint design,
David Farkas outlines the major arguments against bullet points, but rejects
the idea that bullet points are inherently detrimental to instruction. Bullet points tend to over-simplify the ideas of
the presenter. The hierarchy in which
the presenter organizes the bullet points potentially confuse the
audience. And slides with lots of bullet
points encourage the audience to read the slides instead of listening to what
the presenter has to say.3 Given
that these potential problems, how could one use PowerPoint in a more
constructive way and avoid bullet points? A recent presentation moved me to
reflect on how revamping presentations can turn PowerPoint slideshows from a
method for passive information transmission to an engaging and active method of
instruction.
Get the picture?
- Key principles
Dr. Penciner offers up an antidote to the “death by PowerPoint”
approach to teaching. In his discussion of instructional design, he provides
simple suggestions for developing more effective presentations. His approach is
designed around three key principles: tell a story, keep it simple, and manage
your flow.4,5
Tell a story
Storytelling has long been an educational tool, but the art of storytelling has been lost today. Storytelling allows professionals to imagine real life scenarios and to better understand their role in practice.6 Modern instruction can employ new technology to enable “digital storytelling” where multimedia (video, music, etc.) is used to tell stories.6,7 Penciner encourages educators to use PowerPoint to augment the narration of a story by using slides of images that represent the actions or subjects of the story.4,5 In educating health professionals, storytelling using PowerPoint might consist of an image of a patient (fictional or with the patient’s permission!) with the presenter discussing the patient’s “story” or medical history with the class.
Keep it simple
Manage your flow
Armed with these principles, let’s change those bullet points into
images. Let’s use PowerPoint as it was
intended – a tool for effective presentations and audience engagement.
References
- Reynolds G. Presentation Zen: How to design & deliver presentations like a pro. (accessed June 06, 2014).
- Freeman S, Eddy SL, McDonough M, et al. Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics. Proc Nat Acad Sci 2014 Early Edition (doi: 10/1073/pnas)
- Farkas D. A heuristic for reasoning about PowerPoint deck design. (accessed June 06, 2014).
- Penciner R. Does Powerpoint enhance learning? CEJM 2013;15(2):109-112.
- Penciner R. Nine words you need to know for a more effective presentation. (accessed June 06, 2014)
- Matthews J. Voices from the heart: the use of digital story telling in education. Community Pract 2014;87(1):28-30.
- Bernard R. What is digital storytelling? Educational Uses of Digital Storytelling. University of Houston, College of Education. (accessed June 08, 2014)
No comments:
Post a Comment